Professor Vladimir Vuletic from the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade stated that the faculty blockades lasting the past six months will negatively affect the position of the University of Belgrade in global rankings. The university is ranked 20th this year on the Global 2000 list, an improvement from last year, but Vuletic emphasizes that prolonged blockades will have consequences for the university’s reputation and position. Meanwhile, students who organized a hunger strike say their struggle is not a political performance but a last step in fighting injustice, expecting the government to resolve the situation by Vidovdan.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the students’ struggle as a fight against injustice and highlight the importance of addressing their demands. They tend to frame the blockades as a necessary form of protest to bring attention to systemic issues within the university and government. The negative impact on the university’s ranking is acknowledged but often contextualized within broader social and political struggles.
Center: Center-leaning sources provide a balanced view, acknowledging both the students’ right to protest and the negative consequences of prolonged blockades on the university’s reputation and global ranking. They stress the need for dialogue and timely resolution to avoid further damage to the institution’s standing while recognizing the legitimacy of student grievances.
Right: Right-leaning sources focus on the negative impact of the blockades on the university’s global position and reputation, often criticizing the students’ methods as disruptive and harmful. They emphasize the importance of maintaining order and the university’s prestige, calling for swift government intervention to end the blockades and restore normal academic activities.
