A mother of two children sparked a heated debate online after revealing that she gives her daughter a weekly allowance of 50 euros, while her son receives nothing. The mother explained that the daughter agreed to give up her room for a home office, while the son refused, which is why the daughter receives money as compensation. Online comments were divided: some believed the mother was justified because the daughter made a sacrifice, while others felt the son was treated unfairly and that allowances should be equal. The discussion highlights differing views on parenting, fairness, and children’s adaptation to family changes.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the importance of fairness and equal treatment among siblings, often criticizing the mother for favoring the daughter and not providing the son with any allowance. They highlight the son’s emotional struggles with the move and the need for parental empathy and support.
Center: Center-leaning sources present a balanced view, acknowledging the mother’s explanation that the daughter made a tangible sacrifice by giving up her room, justifying the allowance difference. They also recognize the son’s feelings but stress that he had the opportunity to participate and chose not to, framing the situation as a matter of personal responsibility.
Right: Right-leaning sources focus on personal responsibility and consequences of choices, supporting the mother’s decision to reward the daughter for her cooperation and not the son who refused. They often criticize the son’s behavior as disrespectful and emphasize the importance of discipline and accountability in parenting.
