There is a heated debate in Mostar regarding the legality of numerous post-war buildings. Two sides accuse each other while the prosecution, courts, and inspections have not yet made final decisions. The main dispute concerns construction in the central city zone, where a new regulatory plan has not been adopted for years. This situation raises additional questions and tensions between the parties.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the social and legal implications of the post-war property disputes in Mostar, highlighting the need for transparency, justice, and protection of citizens’ rights. They focus on the impact of unresolved property issues on community cohesion and call for fair legal processes.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the dispute in Mostar, presenting the ongoing legal uncertainties and the positions of both sides without strong bias. They highlight the administrative challenges in adopting new urban plans and the importance of resolving the issue to ensure urban development and social stability.
Right: Right-leaning media may focus on the protection of property rights and criticize delays in legal and administrative processes. They might emphasize the need to uphold law and order and support the side they perceive as legally or historically justified, sometimes framing the dispute in terms of ethnic or political interests.
