The main topic of the article is the discussion about the Croatian coat of arms with the first white field, which has long been a taboo due to its association with the NDH (Independent State of Croatia). The article highlights that the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts (HAZU) held a scientific conference and issued a declaration removing the stigma from this coat of arms, confirming its historical authenticity. It discusses the long-standing taboo and political controversies surrounding the use of the coat of arms, as well as the broader social context in Croatia, including issues of corruption, political polarization, and societal challenges.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the problematic historical associations of the Croatian coat of arms with the NDH regime, highlighting concerns about nationalism and the potential glorification of a fascist past. They often critique the normalization of symbols linked to controversial historical periods and stress the importance of confronting historical injustices.
Center: Center-leaning sources focus on the historical and cultural significance of the Croatian coat of arms, acknowledging the controversies but emphasizing the importance of historical accuracy and national identity. They highlight the role of institutions like HAZU in clarifying historical facts and reducing taboos, while also recognizing the political sensitivities involved.
Right: Right-leaning sources emphasize the legitimacy and historical authenticity of the Croatian coat of arms with the first white field, defending it against accusations of being a fascist symbol. They often criticize the long-standing taboo as politically motivated and celebrate the efforts of HAZU to restore national pride and remove unjust stigmas from Croatian symbols.
