Journalist Milan Pantić was murdered 24 years ago in Jagodina, and the perpetrator and instigator of his murder have not yet been identified. Journalist associations and independent media representatives emphasize the lack of political will to uncover the truth and warn that institutional silence could lead to the crime becoming statute-barred. Pantić wrote about privatization and economic issues before his murder, and his case remains unsolved, raising concerns about journalist safety and justice in the region.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the failure of political institutions to pursue justice and the dangers of impunity for crimes against journalists. They highlight the need for transparency, accountability, and protection of press freedom, framing the murder as a symptom of broader systemic issues in governance and human rights.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of the case, noting the unresolved nature of the murder and the calls from journalist associations for a thorough investigation. They focus on the importance of rule of law and the ongoing concern for journalist safety without heavily politicizing the issue.
Right: Right-leaning media may focus on the crime itself and the impact on local communities, sometimes emphasizing law and order and the need for stronger security measures. They might also highlight the role of independent journalism in exposing corruption but may be less focused on systemic political critiques.
