The president of the civic movement URA, Dritan Abazović, called on the government and parliamentary majority for a joint initiative to defend Solana Bajo Sekulić in Ulcinj and return this area to state ownership. Abazović criticized the administrative court’s decision, which he deemed illegal, and emphasized the importance of protecting Montenegro’s natural resources. He highlighted that the Solana area is vast and worth millions of euros, and that previous privatization processes were detrimental to the state. He urged the new parliamentary majority to act together to return Solana to state ownership and improve management of the area with the help of European partners. This topic has sparked various reactions in the public and political circles, focusing on fighting corruption and protecting state property.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the fight against corruption and the protection of public resources from privatization that benefited oligarchs. They highlight the need for transparency and state control over natural resources to ensure equitable management and prevent exploitation by private interests.
Center: Center-leaning sources focus on the legal and administrative aspects of the case, discussing the court decisions and the importance of following due process. They stress the need for cooperation among political actors to resolve the issue and the potential benefits of involving European partners in managing the property.
Right: Right-leaning perspectives may emphasize the importance of property rights and criticize previous government mismanagement. They might also focus on the economic potential of the Solana area and advocate for private sector involvement under strict regulations to boost development while ensuring state interests are protected.