The collapse of the canopy at the Novi Sad railway station on November 1st has sparked controversy. The father of the deceased girl, Goranka Raca, claimed that the collapse was a terrorist act involving the use of a mechanical oscillator that caused vibrations and weakened the canopy’s structure. He filed a criminal complaint and submitted evidence to the prosecution, which opened a case. Raca stated that three days before the collapse, he heard a siren sound and saw workers measuring the canopy’s oscillations, indicating planned actions. These claims have drawn public attention and raised questions about safety and the responsibility of the authorities.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the human tragedy and the need for thorough investigation and accountability. They highlight the father’s claims as a call for justice and criticize any potential negligence by authorities. The narrative focuses on the impact on victims and the demand for transparency.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the incident and the father’s claims without strong bias. They present the ongoing investigation and the official responses, maintaining a neutral tone. The focus is on informing the public about the developments and the legal process.
Right: Right-leaning media may emphasize the possibility of a terrorist act and the security implications. They might highlight the father’s allegations as credible and call for stronger measures against terrorism and sabotage. The narrative may include criticism of the authorities for not preventing such incidents.
