Dragan Djilas, leader of the Party of Freedom and Justice (SSP), criticized the practice where some voters of the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) receive money, packages, or appliances as rewards for voting, while others receive nothing. Djilas highlighted on social media that this is unfair and called on all SNS voters to demand their rights from local or municipal party committees. This issue has drawn media attention as it involves voter pressure and vote buying, which is a serious problem for democratic processes in Serbia.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the criticism of vote buying and voter pressure as a violation of democratic principles. They highlight Đilas’s call for fairness and transparency, framing the issue as a symptom of systemic corruption within the ruling party SNS.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of Đilas’s statements and the allegations of vote buying without strong editorializing. They focus on the implications for electoral integrity and the need for investigation, presenting the issue as a concern for democratic norms.
Right: Right-leaning media may downplay the allegations or frame Đilas’s comments as political opportunism. They might emphasize the legitimacy of SNS’s electoral success and question the motives behind the accusations, suggesting that such claims are attempts to undermine the ruling party.
