The Special State Prosecutor’s Office (SDT) has filed an appeal to the Appellate Court against the first-instance acquittal in the case known as the state coup. Andrija Mandić, Milan Knežević, and 11 others were acquitted of charges including forming a criminal organization and attempted terrorism. The SDT claims that the first-instance verdict involved significant procedural violations and incorrect factual findings, proposing that the appellate court overturn the verdict and convict the accused. This case has attracted significant attention in Montenegrin public and judicial circles.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the importance of due process and the rule of law, often highlighting concerns about political interference in the judiciary. They may focus on the acquittal as a sign of judicial independence or criticize the SDT’s appeal as politically motivated.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the case straightforwardly, focusing on the legal procedures, the charges, and the appeal process. They present balanced views, noting the significance of the case for Montenegro’s political stability and judicial credibility.
Right: Right-leaning media often stress the alleged guilt of the accused and support the SDT’s efforts to hold them accountable. They may portray the acquittal as a miscarriage of justice and emphasize the need for a strong response to threats against the state.
