The main topics in the articles concern the retirement of the Constitutional Court judge of Montenegro, Dragana Đuranović, and the opinion of the Venice Commission confirming that the constitutional procedure was not followed during her retirement. The President of Montenegro, Jakov Milatović, expresses concern over the disregard for the rule of law and expects accountability from political actors. He emphasizes the importance of respecting the constitution and legal procedures, especially in the context of Montenegro’s European integration. The Venice Commission clearly pointed out the procedural violation, and Milatović calls on the competent authorities to carefully consider the commission’s recommendations to ensure legal certainty and stability of the legal order.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the importance of the rule of law and judicial independence, highlighting the Venice Commission’s findings as a critical indicator of political interference in the judiciary. They stress the need for accountability and reforms to strengthen democratic institutions in Montenegro.
Center: Center-leaning sources focus on the factual reporting of the Venice Commission’s opinion and the statements of President Milatović. They underline the importance of following constitutional procedures and the role of the judiciary in Montenegro’s European integration process, advocating for balanced and constructive political dialogue.
Right: Right-leaning sources may emphasize the political implications of the Venice Commission’s opinion, possibly framing the issue as a failure of current political leadership or as evidence of political manipulation within the judiciary. They might call for stronger national sovereignty and caution against external influences on Montenegro’s legal system.
