The main article and related reports emphasize the importance of institutional support for Montenegrin cinematography. Film director Senad Šahmanović highlights that continuity in film production is crucial and that without state support, the film industry stagnates. Artistic director of the Underhill festival, Vuk Perović, stresses the importance of festivals as venues to showcase domestic films and support the film community, but also notes that the festival is a result of individual enthusiasm, with no permanent staff. Cinematography cannot rely solely on individuals; a systemic approach and investments are necessary. In the region, festivals and film production have developed thanks to institutional support, while Montenegro still needs to strengthen its system. The importance of investing in all branches of culture and arts is also highlighted as part of the country’s positive image and an export product.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning reports emphasize the need for increased government funding and institutional support for the arts, viewing cinema as a public good that requires state intervention to thrive. They highlight the role of culture in social development and national identity, advocating for systemic changes to support filmmakers and cultural festivals.
Center: Center-leaning coverage tends to focus on the balance between individual creativity and institutional support, recognizing the importance of both. They acknowledge the challenges faced by the Montenegrin film industry and stress the need for sustainable funding models and partnerships, including regional cooperation and public-private initiatives.
Right: Right-leaning narratives may emphasize the role of individual initiative and entrepreneurship in the film industry, while supporting limited but strategic government involvement. They highlight the potential of film as an export product and a tool for promoting national culture abroad, advocating for efficient use of resources and fostering competitive cultural industries.
