The President of Montenegro, Jakov Milatović, stated that the Venice Commission confirmed that the procedure prescribed by the Constitution was not followed during the retirement of Judge Đuranović. Milatović expressed concern over the lack of accountability among decision-makers and warned against interpreting the Venice Commission’s stance according to current political needs. He called on the competent authorities to carefully consider the recommendations of the Venice Commission and the European Commission before implementing them, emphasizing that only consistent adherence to the Constitution and laws can ensure the stability of the legal order and the independence of institutions, which is crucial for Montenegro’s European path.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning reports emphasize the importance of rule of law and institutional independence, highlighting the Venice Commission’s findings as a call for transparency and accountability in government actions. They stress the need for reforms to ensure that constitutional procedures are respected to protect democratic values and the European integration process.
Center: Center-leaning coverage focuses on the factual confirmation by the Venice Commission that constitutional procedures were not followed, presenting Milatović’s call for careful consideration of recommendations as a balanced approach. The narrative underscores the importance of legal certainty and institutional stability for Montenegro’s progress towards EU integration without overt political bias.
Right: Right-leaning narratives may emphasize the political implications of the Venice Commission’s findings, possibly framing the issue as a failure of current or previous administrations to uphold constitutional order. They might stress the need for stronger governance and accountability, sometimes linking the procedural breach to broader concerns about political manipulation or inefficiency.
