The Director of the Office for Kosovo and Metohija, Petar Petković, emphasized that the decision of the president of the Serbian List, Zlatan Elek, to respond to the summons of the Special Prosecutor’s Office in Priština is an act of courage and responsibility. Petković stated that dozens of Serbs have received similar summonses aimed at intimidating the Serbian people in Kosovo and Metohija, and that the judiciary under Prime Minister Albin Kurti is an instrument of anti-Serbian policy. According to him, the Serbian List shows integrity and resistance to violence, while Priština cannot guarantee fair treatment of Serbs. This situation occurs ahead of local elections and represents a political crisis and pressure on Serbs in Kosovo.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the political pressure and intimidation tactics used by the Kosovo authorities against the Serbian minority, highlighting the role of the judiciary as a tool for political repression. They often frame Zlatan Elek’s decision as a brave stand against injustice and a symbol of peaceful resistance.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of the summons and the political context without strong bias, acknowledging the tensions between Kosovo authorities and the Serbian community. They present Elek’s decision as a responsible act amid a complex political situation, noting the upcoming local elections and the broader implications for interethnic relations.
Right: Right-leaning sources focus on the narrative of Serbian victimhood and the hostile environment created by the Kosovo government under Albin Kurti. They praise Zlatan Elek’s courage and integrity, portraying the summons as part of an anti-Serbian campaign and emphasizing the need for Serbian unity and resistance against oppression.
