The evacuation of Serbian citizens from war zones has raised public concern, especially following the conflict between Israel and Iran, where Serbian nationals were at risk. Former basketball player Vladimir Štimac expressed concern over the lack of an evacuation plan by the Serbian embassy in Tel Aviv. The Serbian government stated that some citizens have already been evacuated and that measures continue to ensure the safe evacuation of the remaining individuals. Military analyst Aleksandar Radić points out that there is no prescribed evacuation procedure, and everything is handled ad hoc. Previous evacuations have been organized from other conflict zones such as Syria, Sudan, and Ukraine, in cooperation with various international organizations and countries. Communication with citizens in war zones is difficult, and some have evacuated independently or with the help of diplomatic and humanitarian channels.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the humanitarian aspect of the evacuation, highlighting the government’s responsibility to protect its citizens abroad and criticizing any delays or lack of preparedness. They focus on the challenges faced by citizens in war zones and call for more transparent and efficient evacuation procedures.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of the evacuation efforts, including government statements and expert opinions. They present a balanced view acknowledging the complexity of evacuations in conflict zones and the ad hoc nature of current procedures, while noting past successful evacuations and ongoing efforts.
Right: Right-leaning sources tend to emphasize national pride in the government’s efforts to evacuate citizens and may highlight the cooperation with international partners. They might downplay criticisms and focus on the successful evacuations already conducted, portraying the government as responsive and effective under difficult circumstances.
