The collapse of the canopy at the railway station in Novi Sad has drawn significant public attention and suspicion. Professor Đuro Raca, father of the tragically deceased girl, filed a criminal complaint for terrorism, claiming the collapse was not an accident but a planned attack. Vojislav Šešelj and Ilija Kajtez express doubts about a possible plan to destabilize Serbia, including the potential goal of Vojvodina’s secession. Sofija Tasić suggests involving foreign security experts, such as Israeli specialists, for a thorough investigation. The topic is presented within a broader political and security context with various perspectives on the causes and consequences of the event.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning reports tend to emphasize the need for thorough investigation and transparency, highlighting the potential political manipulation and the importance of protecting democratic institutions. They may be cautious about conspiracy theories but acknowledge the public’s demand for accountability.
Center: Center-leaning coverage focuses on the facts of the incident and the official investigations, presenting statements from various experts and officials without strong bias. They highlight the tragedy and the calls for expert involvement to clarify the causes, maintaining a balanced view.
Right: Right-leaning narratives emphasize the possibility of a planned attack and foreign interference aimed at destabilizing Serbia and promoting the secession of Vojvodina. They stress national security concerns and criticize the perceived inefficiency of the judiciary and government institutions.
