The investigation by the organization Earshot indicates that protesters at the Belgrade protests on March 15 were likely targeted with sonic weapons, sparking numerous reactions in public and political circles. Left-leaning sources emphasize the seriousness of the allegations and call for accountability from the authorities, while centrist sources highlight the need for further verification and official investigations. Right-leaning sources often question the claims and focus on the political motives of the opposition and international organizations. The Earshot report is considered more credible compared to official reports, and the case has sparked a broader debate about the use of repressive measures against protesters in Serbia.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the credibility of the Earshot investigation, highlighting the use of sonic weapons against peaceful protesters as a serious human rights violation. They call for accountability from the government and criticize attempts to cover up the incident. The narrative focuses on state repression and the need for justice.
Center: Centrist sources acknowledge the findings of the Earshot report but stress the importance of further official investigations to confirm the claims. They present a balanced view, recognizing the concerns raised while calling for due process and transparency from all parties involved.
Right: Right-leaning sources often question the validity of the Earshot report, suggesting that the allegations are politically motivated by opposition groups and foreign actors. They emphasize the government’s stance and downplay the incident, framing it as part of a broader political struggle rather than a confirmed human rights abuse.
