Jelena Perović, the former director of the Anti-Corruption Agency (ASK), claims there are no grounds for her dismissal and that her removal is politically motivated. The ASK council unanimously decided on her dismissal last year, but Perović and her lawyer emphasize that they were not given any concrete reasons or evidence for the decision. Perović has attempted to return to her position but was not allowed. The legal situation surrounding her dismissal is subject to different interpretations, and her mandate expires on July 24. The case has attracted public and legal expert attention, highlighting possible political motives behind the dismissal.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the political motivations behind Jelena Perović’s dismissal, highlighting concerns about the independence of anti-corruption institutions and the potential misuse of power by political actors to remove inconvenient officials. They focus on the lack of transparent legal grounds for her removal and frame it as part of a broader pattern of political interference in watchdog agencies.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of Jelena Perović’s dismissal, noting the official decisions by the ASK council and the legal ambiguities surrounding the case. They present statements from both Perović and the council, emphasizing the procedural aspects and the ongoing legal debates without strongly attributing political motives. The coverage is balanced, focusing on the institutional processes and the implications for governance.
Right: Right-leaning sources may downplay the political motivations behind the dismissal or justify the ASK council’s decision as a necessary step for institutional integrity. They might emphasize the importance of accountability and the rule of law, suggesting that Perović’s removal was based on legitimate concerns, even if not fully disclosed publicly. The narrative may frame the dismissal as part of efforts to strengthen anti-corruption measures.
