Detention as a Message: Law Used for Intimidation or Justice on Trial?
Serbia is once again in turmoil over arrests and detentions related to an audio recording broadcast on six television channels. The Higher Court in Belgrade ordered 30-day detention for Novica Antić, Ivan Matović, and three other men, while one was placed under house arrest, on suspicion of preparing a violent overthrow of the constitutional order. But is this justice or a public spectacle?
A Scandalous Court Decision
Lawyer Ivan Ninić calls this decision scandalous and unprecedented. The case files contain no audio, video, or other evidence resulting from special investigative actions. The prosecution relies on recordings leaked to tabloids, not official evidence. Ninić claims the criminal complaint is a mere political pamphlet, not a legal act with all the required elements.
Uncertainties and Illegality
Lawyer Jovan Rajić emphasizes that not every piece of evidence the prosecution has can be automatically accepted as lawful. Recording and surveillance must be approved by a court, which is unclear in this case. He believes the prosecution staged a “theatrical performance” and has no other evidence besides these recordings.
Politics of Intimidation
This case echoes previous arrests of activists in Novi Sad before protests. The goal is not justice but intimidation and sending a message to anyone who dares to protest. Detention is used as a tool to instill fear and discourage dissent.
Leaks and Tabloidization of Justice
Information about the case first appears in tabloids before reaching official institutions. Lawyer Rajić points out this is illegal and involves the police, prosecution, and BIA. Such information cannot be the result of investigative journalism but is part of a political game.
Selectivity and Lack of Transparency
Previous cases show the prosecution acts selectively and quickly disseminates information through media loyal to the authorities. Retired Major Predrag Simonović notes there is no court order for secret recording in the case, it is unclear who conducted the measures, and there is no clear link between the suspects and the alleged crime.
Conclusion: Justice or a Show?
This case casts a shadow over Serbia’s judicial system. Is detention truly based on evidence, or is it merely a tool for intimidation and political control? While lawyers and experts warn of illegality and lack of evidence, the public remains confused and concerned.
Got thoughts on this? Feel like justice is just a show? Drop a comment and stir the pot — who knows, your voice might just break the silence!
