The Administrative Court of Montenegro ruled that the property of Solana is private, not state-owned, overturning previous attempts to register the land as state property. Eurofond, the largest shareholder of Solana, emphasizes that the state violated legal obligations by failing to convert the right of use into ownership rights, which could have serious legal and financial consequences for Montenegro. They stress that the idea of Solana becoming a nature park is not disputed, but this cannot be a legal basis for confiscating private property. The ruling is an important test of respect for legal security and property rights in Montenegro, and failure to comply could jeopardize the country’s European path and lead to lawsuits in domestic and international courts.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning reports emphasize the importance of protecting private property rights and the rule of law, highlighting the potential negative impact of state interference on legal security and foreign investment. They may also stress the need for social responsibility and environmental protection, supporting the idea of Solana as a nature park but opposing illegal expropriation.
Center: Center-leaning coverage tends to focus on the legal and procedural aspects of the ruling, presenting the facts about the court decision and the obligations of the government under the law. They highlight the balance between respecting private property rights and the public interest, including environmental concerns, without strong political bias.
Right: Right-leaning narratives often stress the sanctity of private property and criticize any government attempts to overreach or politicize legal matters. They may frame the ruling as a victory against state overreach and emphasize the importance of upholding contracts and privatization processes to ensure economic stability and attract investment.
