Novak Adžić, leader of the Montenegrin European Party, criticized the testimony of former police officer Milan Paunović before the inquiry committee, calling it a political tirade without objective facts. Adžić emphasized that such claims should not be debated in the political arena but exclusively before competent judicial authorities with concrete evidence. Other related articles include the inquiry committee’s initiative regarding the beating case of Milorad Mijo Martinović, while other articles about arrests and political events in the region are unrelated to this topic.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the need for judicial processes and concrete evidence rather than political accusations, highlighting Adžić’s call for legal scrutiny over political rhetoric. They may also focus on the broader context of political accountability and justice in Montenegro.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of the testimony and Adžić’s response without strong bias, presenting the political dispute and the call for judicial review as part of normal democratic processes. They provide balanced coverage of the inquiry committee’s activities and related political events.
Right: Right-leaning media may highlight the political nature of the accusations and frame Adžić’s criticism as a defense against politically motivated attacks. They might emphasize the lack of evidence presented by Paunović and portray the inquiry as a politically charged process.
