The main topic of the article is a column where the author comments on the public appearances of Vojvoda Šešelj, particularly his defenses of certain individuals and works, including criticism of the author. The author emphasizes that Šešelj often defends controversial topics and is not considered a serious person, although he causes serious trouble. The article is satirical and critical of the public discourse and perception of seriousness in Serbian society.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets might emphasize the satirical and critical nature of the column, highlighting the problematic aspects of Šešelj’s rhetoric and the dangers of nationalist populism. They may focus on the need to critically assess public figures who spread divisive or controversial views.
Center: Center-leaning sources would likely present a balanced view, acknowledging the satirical tone of the column while also recognizing Šešelj’s controversial role in Serbian politics. They might focus on the importance of free speech and the complexity of public discourse in Serbia.
Right: Right-leaning media might downplay the criticism of Šešelj or frame it as an unfair attack by the author. They could emphasize Šešelj’s role as a defender of national interests and portray the column as biased or disrespectful towards a nationalist figure.
