The Montenegrin Anti-Corruption Agency (ASK) has challenged the lawsuit filed by former President of Montenegro Milo Đukanović, in which he sought compensation for alleged mental distress. ASK claims there is no evidence supporting these claims and that the lawsuit is untidy and legally unfounded. Đukanović sued ASK over a decision that he violated the anti-corruption law related to the revolving card of Atlas Bank, seeking damages of 5 million euros. The lawsuit is under dispute in the Podgorica Basic Court, and ASK states that the decision was made within its legal authority and that Đukanović consistently upheld the public interest during his tenure.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the importance of anti-corruption measures and the role of the agency in holding powerful figures accountable. They highlight the lack of evidence in Đukanović’s claims and frame the lawsuit as an attempt to undermine transparency and accountability.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the case neutrally, focusing on the legal aspects of the lawsuit and the procedural details. They present statements from both Đukanović and the Anti-Corruption Agency without taking a strong stance, emphasizing the ongoing judicial process.
Right: Right-leaning media tend to emphasize Đukanović’s long service and dedication to public interest, portraying him as a victim of political persecution. They question the legitimacy of the agency’s decision and frame the lawsuit as a defense of Đukanović’s reputation against unfounded accusations.
