Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe was shot and wounded in an assassination attempt during a campaign rally in Bogota. The attack was strongly condemned by the government and President Gustavo Petro, emphasizing that it was an attack on democracy and freedom of thought. Uribe, a right-wing politician and critic of the current government, was hit twice in the head and once in the knee, and his condition is serious. Authorities have arrested a suspect, a minor, and the investigation is ongoing. Among international reactions, the United States strongly condemned the attack. This event has raised concerns about political security in Colombia ahead of the upcoming elections.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the attack as a symptom of political violence and instability in Colombia, highlighting the government’s condemnation and the threat to democracy. They often frame Uribe as a controversial right-wing figure whose policies have contributed to social divisions, while stressing the need for peaceful political processes.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the attack and the responses from government officials and international actors, focusing on the seriousness of the incident and the ongoing investigation. They highlight the importance of maintaining democratic norms and political stability ahead of the elections without taking strong partisan stances.
Right: Right-leaning media focus on the attack as an assault on conservative political figures and democratic freedoms, portraying Uribe as a victim of leftist aggression. They emphasize the condemnation from international allies like the United States and criticize the current leftist government for failing to ensure security, calling for stronger measures against political violence.
