The main topic of the article is the blockade of the entrance to the Novi Sad Assembly building by a group of protesters aiming to prevent the session and the adoption of the budget rebalancing. Mayor Žarko Mićin condemns the blockade as politically motivated and harmful to the city’s development, emphasizing that the blockade aims to stop infrastructure projects such as wells, water pipeline galleries, kindergartens, roads, and bridges. The police intervened to enable the session to take place. The topic is reported with different emphases depending on the political leaning of the media: left-leaning outlets highlight the social and infrastructural needs of citizens and criticize the blockade as an obstruction to development; centrist media focus on legal aspects and procedural legitimacy of the session and elections; right-leaning media emphasize the political motives of the blockers and support the city authorities in their efforts to ensure stability and development.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning media emphasize the social and infrastructural needs of the citizens of Novi Sad, criticizing the blockade as an obstruction to the development and well-being of the community. They tend to highlight the negative impact of political conflicts on ordinary people and stress the importance of public services and infrastructure projects.
Center: Centrist media focus on the legal and procedural aspects of the situation, discussing the legitimacy of the assembly session and the legal requirements for local elections. They present a balanced view, acknowledging the political tensions but emphasizing adherence to laws and regulations.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the political motives behind the blockade, portraying the protesters as a small group with selfish political goals aiming to destabilize the city administration. They support the city authorities and the mayor’s stance, highlighting the need for stability, development, and the continuation of important infrastructure projects.
