The blockade plan in Serbia, which includes stopping coal deliveries to thermal power plants and blocking access to an international exhibition, is seen as an attempt by the opposition and students to retain media attention and political support. Political analyst Branko Radun points out that the blockades harm the state but serve as a means to attract public attention and maintain the visibility of opposition groups ahead of upcoming elections. According to him, the opposition uses provocative actions to provoke government reactions and portray themselves as victims of repression. This situation reflects a struggle for political space between various opposition actors and students, while protest energy is waning.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the protestors’ motivations as a fight against government policies and repression, highlighting the democratic right to protest and the need for political change. They often portray the blockades as legitimate civil disobedience aimed at drawing attention to social and environmental issues.
Center: Center-leaning sources tend to present a balanced view, acknowledging both the protestors’ right to demonstrate and the negative impact of the blockades on the state and public services. They focus on the political strategy behind the blockades and the implications for upcoming elections, without strongly favoring either side.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the blockades as harmful actions that damage the state and economy, portraying the protestors as provocateurs seeking media attention rather than genuine political change. They often criticize the opposition for using disruptive tactics and suggest that these actions undermine public order and stability.
