In Belgrade, traffic intersections Nemanjina and Kneza Miloša are blocked due to protests known as “blockades.” The protesters demand reforms in higher education, including the dissolution of the working group for a new law, opening public discussions, and adopting budget quotas for university admissions. The blockaders have set up tents at the intersection, indicating a prolonged blockade. The turnout at the protests was not large, and media report various reactions from citizens and authorities. This situation causes traffic problems and diverse political commentary in Serbia.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the protesters’ demands for educational reform and criticize the government’s handling of the situation, highlighting the need for inclusive dialogue and support for students. They often portray the blockades as a legitimate form of protest against inadequate policies in higher education.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the blockades and protests, focusing on the impact on traffic and daily life in Belgrade. They present statements from both protesters and authorities, aiming for balanced coverage without strong bias, emphasizing the need for dialogue and resolution.
Right: Right-leaning media tend to focus on the disruption caused by the blockades, describing the protesters as a nuisance or even as engaging in ‘terror’ against citizens. They highlight the negative impact on traffic and public order, often criticizing the protesters’ methods and questioning the legitimacy of their demands.