Blockades of intersections in Serbia have become the main topic of a political storm shaking the country. Miloš Vučević, president of the Serbian Progressive Party, leaves no doubt – these blockades are terrorism, not civil disobedience. He clearly states that elections will not be called because of these blockades, despite the pressure and hopes of some “rude” groups who think they can topple Aleksandar Vučić’s government this way.
Vučević sharply condemns vandalism and violence during protests, emphasizing that the blockades disrupt the normal life of six million Serbian citizens, while only 15 to 20 thousand people are harassing the majority. Police and security agencies are working professionally, but Vučević warns that the judiciary and prosecution remain weak links, allowing some to commit new crimes.
Prime Minister Ana Brnabić calls the blockades in Belgrade a sign of helplessness and frustration, while police break up blockades and restore order. Vučević claims the goal of the blockades is to overthrow President Vučić and destroy the state, which would lead to a puppet government and loss of Kosovo.
Meanwhile, Aleksandar Vučić from Spain says he has not fled, that the state has the strength to maintain order, and that hooligans were quickly and professionally removed. He demands accountability for those who insult journalists, especially Anja Vesović from Informer, while Ivica Dačić confirms that blockades across Serbia, including Belgrade and Novi Sad, are part of a wave of protests following student arrests.
The situation is pure chaos – traffic is blocked, SNS offices are vandalized, and the state struggles to maintain peace and stability. Is this really civil disobedience or a terrorist attack on the state? Drop your thoughts below and tell us – are the blockades justified or just an excuse for chaos and violence?
