The bombing of the Varvarin Bridge on May 30 claimed 10 lives and seriously injured 17 people. Marina Lukić, one of the few survivors, shared her emotional testimony about this tragic event. Memories of that day remain vivid, and Marina, now a psychiatrist and psychotherapist, speaks about loss, fear, and scars that never fade. Her story highlights the horror of the bombing, her personal struggle for survival, and the long recovery process, as well as her dedication to helping others who carry trauma. This event is often referenced in the context of NATO’s bombing of Serbia, focusing on civilian casualties and the consequences of war.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the human cost of the NATO bombing, focusing on the civilian casualties and the long-lasting trauma experienced by survivors like Marina Lukić. They highlight the tragedy and question the military necessity of targeting civilian infrastructure, portraying the event as a war crime and a symbol of the suffering caused by Western military intervention.
Center: Centrist sources report the event factually, focusing on the details of the bombing, the number of casualties, and survivor testimonies. They present Marina Lukić’s story as a human interest piece, emphasizing resilience and recovery without heavily politicizing the event. The coverage tends to balance the military context with the humanitarian impact.
Right: Right-leaning media often frame the bombing as an unjustified attack on Serbian civilians, emphasizing national victimhood and the brutality of NATO forces. They may use Marina’s testimony to underscore the narrative of Serbian suffering and resilience, sometimes linking the event to broader themes of Western aggression and the defense of national sovereignty.