Political analyst Borislav Korkodelović stated that Donald Trump could not be a mediator in ending the Iran-Israel conflict. He believes the US could only mediate if Iran agrees to an unfair ceasefire, which includes abandoning its nuclear program and ending the Islamic Republic, which is currently unfeasible. Korkodelović emphasizes that the US role is contradictory and that it will never allow Israel’s security to be compromised.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the complexity of the Iran-Israel conflict and criticize the US’s contradictory role, highlighting the challenges of US mediation and the broader implications of US foreign policy in the Middle East.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of Korkodelović’s analysis, focusing on the current geopolitical realities and the conditions under which the US might act as a mediator, without strong bias or editorializing.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize the security of Israel as paramount and view US involvement as necessary but conditional, often stressing Iran’s responsibility for the conflict and the improbability of Iran conceding to US demands.
