Borivoj Gerzić in an interview discusses the essence of art and the inner struggle every artist faces. He emphasizes that the true battle is with the inner opponent and that external circumstances should not dictate artistic work. Gerzić talks about the injustice towards artists whose work often goes unnoticed, the challenges of literature in small nations like the Serbian, and the impact of global trends on culture and individuals. He criticizes modern society for egocentrism and narcissism, stressing the importance of collectivism as a corrective. He also comments on the political situation in Serbia, pointing out corruption and the influence of powerful clans, as well as difficulties in artistic and social life. His novel is hermetic and requires deep inner searching, not suitable for superficial readers. Gerzić reflects on themes of life’s meaning, faith, and human nature, concluding that life is full of contradictions and the quest for meaning and peace is eternal and complex.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources would emphasize Gerzić’s critique of capitalist and neoliberal influences on art and culture, highlighting the negative impact of global capitalism on local cultures and the individual. They would focus on his call for collectivism and critique of egocentrism and narcissism as symptoms of capitalist societies. The political critique of corruption and elite power structures would be underscored as systemic issues needing structural change.
Center: Center-leaning sources would present Gerzić’s views as a balanced reflection on the challenges faced by artists and intellectuals in contemporary society. They would highlight his emphasis on perseverance, the importance of quality work, and the complex relationship between individual creativity and societal conditions. The political commentary would be framed as a call for transparency and good governance without strong ideological bias.
Right: Right-leaning sources might focus on Gerzić’s emphasis on individual responsibility and inner struggle, aligning with values of personal discipline and self-reliance. They might downplay systemic critiques and instead highlight the importance of traditional values, cultural identity, and the role of the individual in overcoming adversity. The critique of globalism and multinational corporations might be framed as a defense of national sovereignty and cultural heritage.