Bosnia and Herzegovina has the highest number of coal-fired power plants in Southeast Europe, using outdated technology that significantly contributes to air pollution. According to a report by a network of environmental organizations, sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants in BiH exceed permitted limits multiple times, posing a serious health risk, especially to children. The Ugljevik, Gacko, Tuzla 6, and Kakanj 7 power plants are among the largest polluters in the region. Pollution is not only an environmental issue but also causes a large number of deaths annually. This problem is recognized by international organizations such as UNICEF and the World Bank.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the environmental and public health impacts of the coal-fired power plants in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They highlight the outdated technology, excessive pollution levels, and the urgent need for transition to cleaner energy sources. The narrative focuses on the human cost, especially the impact on children’s health, and calls for stronger environmental regulations and international support for sustainable development.
Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts about the number of coal power plants and their pollution levels, acknowledging the environmental and health risks. They tend to present balanced views, including the economic importance of these plants for energy production and employment, while recognizing the need for modernization and pollution control measures. The narrative is pragmatic, focusing on gradual reforms and investments in cleaner technologies.
Right: Right-leaning sources may emphasize the economic and energy security aspects of coal power plants in Bosnia and Herzegovina. They might downplay the environmental concerns or frame them as challenges to be managed without drastic changes that could harm the economy or energy supply. The narrative often stresses the importance of maintaining energy independence and protecting jobs in the coal industry, advocating for a cautious approach to environmental regulations.
