Philosophy professor Čedomir Antić stated that since March 15, it is not Aleksandar Vučić who is “dinsta” but the university, referring to blockades and issues in higher education in Serbia. Antić expressed opposition to the blockades and said he is ready to participate in TV shows, while some professors avoid public appearances. The topic of blockades and the state of the university has sparked various reactions in the media, emphasizing political and social consequences. Some media highlight problems in education and call for dialogue, while others emphasize political implications and criticize the government. This situation is part of a broader context of political tensions and social divisions in Serbia.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning media tend to emphasize the negative impact of the blockades on students and the education system, calling for dialogue and reforms. They often criticize the government for the political manipulation of the university crisis and highlight the voices of academics and students opposing the regime.
Center: Center-leaning outlets report the facts of the blockades and statements by Čedomir Antić with a balanced tone, presenting both the government’s and the opposition’s views. They focus on the need for resolution and the importance of maintaining educational standards while acknowledging political tensions.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize Čedomir Antić’s criticism of the blockades and frame the university as opposing the government rather than the other way around. They often portray the blockades as politically motivated disruptions and support the government’s stance, highlighting Antić’s readiness to engage publicly and criticizing those who avoid debate.
