The Chinese Embassy in London condemned statements by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte regarding the alleged buildup of the Chinese military. The embassy emphasized that China is not a scapegoat for NATO and called on NATO to correct its misperception of China, stop spreading security concerns, and not use China as an excuse for military buildup that undermines global and regional security. Rutte stated in London that China, cooperating with Russia, North Korea, and Iran, is rapidly modernizing and expanding its military. This topic has elicited varied reactions across media outlets with different political leanings.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the Chinese embassy’s condemnation of NATO’s accusations, framing China as a victim of Western military posturing and highlighting the risks of escalating tensions due to NATO’s narrative. They often criticize NATO for using China as a scapegoat to justify its own military expansions.
Center: Center-leaning media report the facts of the statements from both sides, presenting the Chinese embassy’s rejection of the accusations alongside NATO Secretary General Rutte’s concerns about China’s military growth. They focus on the diplomatic exchanges and the implications for global security without strong bias.
Right: Right-leaning sources emphasize the threat posed by China’s rapid military modernization and its cooperation with countries like Russia, North Korea, and Iran. They support NATO’s stance and highlight the need for vigilance against China’s growing military power, often portraying China as a strategic adversary.
