The concession process of Montenegrin airports has sparked numerous controversies and political tensions in Montenegro. The government extended the deadline for evaluating bids amid suspicions about the regularity of the procedure, including accusations of political pressure and possible favoritism towards certain investors. Criticism comes from various political and expert circles, including airport unions and international financial institutions such as the World Bank. There is concern that the concession could jeopardize the state’s sovereignty over strategic infrastructure and negatively impact the economy and tourism. Some politicians and activists call for transparency and halting the process until all doubts are clarified.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the risks of corruption, political pressure, and loss of sovereignty over strategic infrastructure. They highlight the negative impact on the economy and tourism, and call for transparency and accountability in the concession process. They are critical of the government’s handling and warn against privatization that may not benefit the public.
Center: Center-leaning sources focus on the procedural aspects of the concession, noting the government’s efforts to ensure transparency by extending the evaluation period and consulting experts like the World Bank. They acknowledge the controversies but stress the importance of attracting investment and improving airport management for economic growth.
Right: Right-leaning sources tend to defend the government’s position, emphasizing the need for efficient management of key resources and the potential benefits of concession agreements. They may downplay allegations of corruption and political pressure, framing the concession as a necessary step for modernization and economic development.
