The Center for Civic Rights (CGP) filed a criminal complaint against Vojo Laković, a security professor from Banja Luka, for statements that, according to CGP, incited threats to the security of Democratic Party of Socialists MP Oskar Huter. The complaint was submitted to the Higher Basic State Prosecutor’s Office in Podgorica and includes allegations of discrimination, security threats, and incitement to criminal acts. CGP emphasizes concern that such a statement was made by a security professor, who is expected to act responsibly and with restraint. The complaint followed after Laković, in a RTCG broadcast, commented on Huter’s actions and stated that Huter “will not be able to walk Montenegro telling the people everything,” which was interpreted as a threat and incitement to threaten Huter’s security.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the importance of protecting political figures from threats and the role of institutions like the Center for Civic Rights in holding individuals accountable for incitement and hate speech. They highlight the responsibility of public figures, especially those with security expertise, to act responsibly and the dangers of political intimidation.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the complaint and the statements made by Vojo Laković, focusing on the legal aspects and the procedural steps taken by the Center for Civic Rights and the Prosecutor’s Office. They maintain a neutral tone, presenting the incident as a matter of public interest and legal scrutiny without strong editorializing.
Right: Right-leaning perspectives may question the motivations behind the complaint, possibly framing it as political maneuvering or an attempt to silence dissenting voices. They might emphasize freedom of speech concerns and criticize the Center for Civic Rights for overreach or politicization of the issue.
