The president of the People’s Party, Vladimir Gajić, publicly criticized the work of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Novi Sad, particularly prosecutor Slobodan Joksimović, who, according to him, scheduled a vacation amid important cases. Gajić also announced the collection of signatures for the dismissal of Chief Public Prosecutor Zagorka Dolovac, accusing her and her associates of incompetence and irresponsibility in handling investigations, especially in the case of the canopy collapse. Statements from the prosecutor’s office and court reactions highlight issues within the judicial system, while the opposition uses the situation for political pressure and calls for reforms. The topic is reported with varying interpretations across media with different political leanings.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the need for judicial reform and accountability, highlighting the incompetence and possible corruption within the prosecutor’s office. They focus on the failures in the investigation of the canopy collapse and support the calls for the dismissal of Zagorka Dolovac as a step towards justice and transparency.
Center: Centrist media report the facts of the case, presenting statements from both the opposition and the prosecutor’s office. They highlight the procedural issues in the investigation and the political tensions surrounding the calls for Dolovac’s dismissal, aiming for balanced coverage without strong bias.
Right: Right-leaning sources tend to focus on the criticism of the prosecutor’s office and the alleged negligence of officials like Joksimović. They support the opposition’s demands for accountability and frame the issue as a failure of the current judicial leadership, often linking it to broader critiques of the government and establishment.
