Luko Paskojević has opened an observation deck called Dubrovnik Skyview on his family land in Dubrovnik, charging an entrance fee of three euros for enjoying panoramic views of the city and surroundings. Residents of Dubrovnik and certain groups, such as war veterans, have free access. Paskojević emphasizes that the observation deck is a private investment and that he is not selling the view but the experience and ambiance. Criticism has been directed at charging for the view, but he explains that charging for views is common worldwide, citing examples from New York and London. The observation deck is aesthetically integrated into the environment, and visitors are generally satisfied with the offer. He plans additional features like telescopes and VR simulators. He notes that no hospitality services are offered and that local visitors have unlimited time access.
Political Perspectives:
Left: The left-leaning coverage tends to emphasize the social implications of charging for a view that many consider a public good, highlighting concerns about accessibility for local residents and the commercialization of natural and cultural heritage. It may question the fairness of privatizing views and the impact on community access.
Center: Centrist reports focus on the factual aspects of the new observation deck, presenting both the entrepreneur’s perspective and the public’s reaction. They highlight the business model, the investment in private property, and the comparison with similar practices worldwide, providing a balanced view of the controversy.
Right: Right-leaning narratives emphasize private property rights and entrepreneurial initiative, defending the right to monetize private investments. They stress that locals and certain groups have free access and that charging tourists for unique experiences is a legitimate business practice, often comparing it to similar global examples.
