The conflict between Israel and Iran escalated in June 2025, with Israeli airstrikes targeting Iranian military sites and Iranian missile and drone attacks on Israeli cities. As tensions rise, citizens in both countries spend hours in shelters, facing danger and uncertainty. Israeli and Iranian social media users shared touching messages reflecting the human dimension of the conflict. Israeli officials have announced possible retaliations, while international observers warn of the risk of a prolonged conflict. The Serbian consulate in Israel is monitoring the situation and urging caution among its citizens. The conflict has elicited varied media responses, ranging from emphasis on military strategy and political threats to humanitarian consequences and calls for peace.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning media emphasize the human cost of the Israel-Iran conflict, highlighting stories of civilians caught in the crossfire, the emotional exchanges between ordinary people from both sides, and the urgent need for diplomatic solutions to prevent further escalation. They often critique military actions and call for peace and humanitarian aid.
Center: Center-leaning outlets focus on balanced reporting of the conflict, detailing the military developments, official statements from both Israel and Iran, and the international diplomatic efforts to contain the situation. They provide factual updates on casualties, political responses, and the broader geopolitical implications without strong bias.
Right: Right-leaning media emphasize Israel’s right to defend itself against Iranian aggression, highlighting the threats posed by Iran’s nuclear program and missile attacks. They often support strong military responses and portray Iran as the primary aggressor, stressing the need for decisive action to ensure Israel’s security.