The main article and related articles report on the political conflict between Željko Kerum and Tomislav Šuta, the new mayor of Split. Kerum harshly criticized Šuta for his statements and urged him to focus on working for the city rather than personal promotion. Šuta rejected the possibility of a coalition with Kerum and announced he would not agree to trade coalitions, being ready to call new elections if he cannot form a majority in the City Council. This conflict is portrayed as an important political event in Split, emphasizing the power struggle and political games within local government.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the political struggle as a reflection of broader issues of governance and accountability in local politics. They highlight Šuta’s stance against ‘trade coalitions’ and his readiness to call new elections as a positive move towards transparency and democratic processes. Kerum’s criticism is seen as an attempt to maintain old political influences.
Center: Centrist sources report the conflict factually, focusing on the statements made by both Kerum and Šuta. They present the political dynamics in Split as a typical local government power struggle, noting the potential for new elections and the importance of forming a stable majority in the City Council.
Right: Right-leaning sources may emphasize Kerum’s criticism of Šuta, portraying Kerum as a defender of the city’s interests against what they might frame as Šuta’s inexperience or political posturing. They might also highlight the need for strong leadership and continuity in local governance.
