Kija Kockar waited a long time for the court case against Jelena Krunić regarding the statement that Kija allegedly sold her father’s funeral for 15 euros. The trial was held in Čačak after almost six years since the lawsuit was filed. Kija shared on social media information about health problems caused by stress due to this dispute. She stated that her health condition showed prediabetes, caused by stress and poor sleep. Kija emphasized that Jelena Krunić’s claims are false and that the case was already decided in her favor. She also praised the court in Čačak for its professional approach to handling the case. This case attracted significant media and public attention.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets focus on the human and emotional aspect of Kija Kockar’s experience, emphasizing the stress and health impact caused by the prolonged legal battle. They highlight the injustice of the public humiliation and the importance of mental health awareness. The narrative often sympathizes with Kija as a victim of defamation and stresses the need for accountability in public discourse.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the court case in a balanced manner, detailing the timeline of the lawsuit, the legal proceedings, and the statements from both parties. They emphasize the procedural aspects, the court’s role, and the resolution of the case, while also noting the public interest and media coverage. The health issues are mentioned as part of the personal impact but are not the main focus.
Right: Right-leaning media tend to highlight Kija Kockar’s resilience and her proactive approach to dealing with the stress and health challenges. They may also focus on the legal victory and the importance of defending one’s reputation against false accusations. The narrative can include praise for the judicial system’s efficiency and the importance of personal responsibility in managing health and public image.