Former Prime Minister of Montenegro Zdravko Krivokapic stated that the airport tender must be canceled to avoid another disgrace and that the evaluation of bids should not be a political agreement. He emphasized that the reputation of the state is above individuals, parties, and interests. Krivokapic warned of suspicions of irregularities in the tender process and called on politicians to protect Montenegro’s interests. This topic elicits different reactions across the political spectrum: the left emphasizes the need for transparency and anti-corruption efforts, the center stresses the importance of legal procedures and stability, while the right often supports the current government and its decisions regarding infrastructure projects.
Political Perspectives:
Left: The left-leaning narratives focus on the need for transparency, anti-corruption measures, and accountability in the tender process. They emphasize the importance of protecting public interest and preventing political interference or corruption in awarding infrastructure contracts.
Center: The center perspective highlights the importance of following legal procedures and ensuring stability in governance. It stresses that any decision regarding the tender should be based on objective evaluation and due process, avoiding political conflicts that could harm the country’s reputation.
Right: The right-leaning narratives tend to support the current government’s decisions and emphasize the importance of completing infrastructure projects efficiently. They may downplay allegations of irregularities and focus on the economic benefits and strategic importance of the airport concessions.
