An informal network of 18 NGOs in Montenegro, Coalition 27, presented reports to the European House on Montenegro’s progress in Chapters 27 (environmental protection and climate change) and 15 (energy). Although decision-makers claim all obligations will be closed by the end of the year, Coalition 27 considers the progress limited. The topic is important for Montenegro’s European integration, with reports highlighting challenges in meeting environmental and energy standards. The issue is viewed through different political perspectives emphasizing the need for transparency, reforms, and combating populism and nationalism.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the environmental and social justice aspects of Montenegro’s limited progress, highlighting the need for stronger environmental protections, climate action, and inclusive reforms. They criticize the government for insufficient commitment and call for increased civil society involvement and transparency.
Center: Center-leaning sources focus on the technical and procedural aspects of Montenegro’s progress in meeting EU accession criteria, acknowledging some achievements but noting delays and challenges. They stress the importance of continued reforms and cooperation with EU institutions to meet obligations on environment and energy.
Right: Right-leaning sources tend to emphasize national sovereignty and economic concerns, sometimes questioning the pace and cost of environmental regulations. They may highlight bureaucratic inefficiencies and stress the need for pragmatic approaches that balance environmental goals with economic development and energy security.
