Member of Parliament Milenko Jovanov condemned Marinika Tepić for her false claims linking Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić to narcotics. Jovanov demanded that Tepić apologize to Vučić and his family or face legal consequences. He emphasized that Tepić has been caught lying multiple times and that her behavior is abnormal, calling for a psychiatric evaluation. Jovanov also criticized the media and other opposition figures supporting Tepić, stating that it is time to put an end to the lies. This topic has sparked divided reactions in the public and media, with different political perspectives focusing on the legitimacy of the accusations, the responsibility of politicians, and freedom of expression.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the importance of freedom of speech and political criticism, often framing Marinika Tepić’s statements as part of legitimate opposition scrutiny of the government. They may highlight concerns about government attempts to silence dissent and the broader context of political repression.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of the incident, focusing on the legal and ethical aspects of the accusations and responses. They present both sides, noting Jovanov’s condemnation and Tepić’s controversial statements, while emphasizing the need for accountability and respect in political discourse.
Right: Right-leaning media strongly support Milenko Jovanov’s condemnation of Marinika Tepić, portraying her as dishonest and irresponsible. They stress the need for legal consequences for spreading false information and defend President Vučić against what they describe as baseless attacks by opposition figures.
