Miloš Kerkez, a talented footballer, decided to play for the Hungarian national team instead of Serbia. His father, Sebastijan Kerkez, explained that the reason was the lack of calls from Serbia in the youth categories while he was playing in Hungary. Although Miloš was considered an important part of Serbia’s football future, Serbia did not sufficiently recognize him, while Hungary was more active in calling him up and developing him. Miloš has debuted for the Hungarian senior national team and has accumulated 23 appearances so far. His father is proud of his decision, even though he identifies as Serbian. This situation highlights issues in the selection of young talents in Serbian football and sparks discussion about how promising players are treated.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets tend to emphasize the systemic issues within Serbian football’s talent development and selection process, highlighting how neglect and bureaucracy lead to losing talented players like Miloš Kerkez to other national teams. They may also discuss the broader implications for national identity and the need for reform in sports institutions.
Center: Centrist sources report the facts of Miloš Kerkez’s decision neutrally, focusing on the timeline of calls from both Serbia and Hungary, the player’s career development, and the father’s explanation. They present the story as a case of missed opportunities by Serbian football authorities without strong editorializing.
Right: Right-leaning media often frame the story around national pride and the disappointment of losing a talented player to another country. They may emphasize the player’s Serbian heritage and the failure of Serbian football institutions to properly value and integrate players of Serbian descent, sometimes linking it to broader themes of national loyalty and identity.
