Miloš Vučević, leader of SNS and advisor to the president on regional affairs, criticized the behavior of Rector Đokić, calling it strange and unacceptable due to his absence from a meeting with the prime minister. Vučević emphasized that the rector’s actions endanger students and the educational process because of his “imagined projects.” He also stressed that it is unacceptable for institutions within Serbia to criticize their own country and to punish entire generations of children for personal goals. Vučević defended SNS and the government, stating they have been elected twice and are leading the country. This comment is part of a broader political debate about education and political pressures in Serbia.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the political motivations behind Vučević’s criticism, framing it as an attempt to suppress academic freedom and dissent within Serbian universities. They highlight concerns about government interference in educational institutions and the negative impact on students’ rights and academic independence.
Center: Centrist sources report the event factually, focusing on Vučević’s statements and the rector’s absence from the meeting. They present the issue as part of ongoing tensions between political authorities and university leadership, noting the concerns about the organization of student enrollment and the impact on education without strong editorializing.
Right: Right-leaning sources emphasize Vučević’s defense of the government and criticize the rector for what they describe as irresponsible behavior that harms students and the country’s educational system. They frame Vučević’s comments as a justified response to protect national interests and criticize those who oppose the ruling party’s policies.
