The main article describes a deep political and judicial crisis in Montenegro, termed the ‘twilight zone’, where clientelist groups and fascist elements destabilize society, while revisionism and chauvinism threaten the country’s European future. The judiciary is compromised, and political elites are accused of corruption and obstructing reforms. Another related article from Portal Analitika further emphasizes that Montenegro is losing its chances for European integration due to lack of political will and institutional consolidation, and that the government of Prime Minister Spajić and President Milatović is leading the country backwards under the influence of authoritarian regimes and Greater Serbian interests. Other articles are unrelated to this topic.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources emphasize the systemic corruption, clientelism, and the rise of fascist and nationalist elements undermining democracy and social cohesion in Montenegro. They highlight the failure of the judiciary and the complicity of media and NGOs in promoting divisive nationalist narratives. The left criticizes the current government for regressing on democratic reforms and warns about the dangers of authoritarianism and nationalism.
Center: Centrist perspectives focus on the challenges Montenegro faces in meeting the requirements for European Union accession, pointing to institutional weaknesses and political instability. They stress the importance of reforms in the judiciary and governance to restore credibility and advance integration. The centrists acknowledge geopolitical pressures and the complex regional dynamics influencing Montenegro’s political landscape.
Right: Right-leaning narratives may downplay the severity of the crisis or frame it as a consequence of external pressures and biased accusations against nationalist elements. They might emphasize sovereignty concerns and criticize EU conditionality as excessive interference. Some right-wing views could support the current government’s stance against what they perceive as hostile foreign influence or internal subversion.
