Historian Bogdan Živković criticized statements made by Montenegro’s Foreign Minister Ervin Ibrahimović, highlighting their devastating potential for regional relations, especially regarding Montenegro’s stance on Kosovo and Serbia. Živković believes that certain circles in Montenegro do not perceive the country’s sovereignty as independence from Serbia, but rather as Serbia’s sovereignty over Montenegro. He noted that Ibrahimović’s statements are part of particular interests and could provoke a new institutional crisis in Montenegro. The Serbian side reacted moderately, while it is expected that most of Montenegro’s government does not support such a policy. The topic is significant for regional relations and highlights tensions between Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning sources tend to emphasize the destabilizing impact of nationalist and secessionist rhetoric in the Balkans, criticizing hardline stances that exacerbate regional tensions. They highlight the need for dialogue and cooperation among Balkan states and often view Montenegro’s foreign policy moves as influenced by ethno-nationalist agendas that hinder regional stability.
Center: Centrist sources report the statements factually, focusing on the political dynamics within Montenegro and the region. They present the views of historian Živković as a critical voice on the potential consequences of Montenegro’s foreign policy decisions, noting the delicate balance in the government coalition and the possible institutional crises. The coverage is balanced, acknowledging multiple perspectives without strong bias.
Right: Right-leaning sources emphasize the defense of Serbian national interests and sovereignty in the region. They often portray Montenegro’s foreign policy, especially moves perceived as supporting Kosovo’s independence, as antagonistic and harmful to Serbian interests. The criticism of Montenegro’s officials is framed as a defense against anti-Serbian policies, highlighting the need to protect Serbian identity and influence in the Balkans.
