Norway has tightened its rape laws by criminalizing sexual intercourse without explicit consent, joining a growing list of countries expanding the definition of sexual assault. Previously, prosecutors had to prove that the assailant used force or threatened force, or that the victim was unable to resist. Under the new law, anyone who has sexual intercourse without consent, expressed by word or deed, can be convicted of rape, even without violence. Similar consent-based rape laws have been introduced in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland, leading to significant increases in rape convictions.
Political Perspectives:
Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the importance of the new law in protecting victims’ rights and advancing gender equality. They highlight the progressive nature of consent-based laws and the positive impact seen in other Nordic countries, such as increased conviction rates and better support for survivors.
Center: Centrist sources report the legal changes factually, focusing on the legislative process and comparisons with similar laws in neighboring countries. They note the shift from force-based to consent-based definitions and mention statistical outcomes without strong editorializing.
Right: Right-leaning media may express concerns about potential overreach or the implications for due process, emphasizing the need to balance victims’ rights with protecting the accused. They might highlight debates about legal definitions and caution against laws that could lead to false accusations.
