parliament discussion on pension adjustment and notary fees

The Croatian Parliament will discuss important laws next week concerning pension adjustment and the payment of notary fees. The proposed pension insurance law introduces a new formula for adjusting pensions twice a year, with an 85 to 15 ratio favoring the more beneficial factor. Mothers will be credited with 12 months of service for each child born or adopted, an annual pension supplement known as the 13th pension will be introduced, and minimum and disability pensions will be increased. The penalty for early retirement at age 70 will be abolished, and retirees will be allowed to work while receiving 50% of their pension. Additionally, a law on notary fees is being considered, which provides exemptions from fee payments for certain categories of citizens based on income and property. These laws aim to improve social security and legal protection for citizens.

Political Perspectives:

Left: Left-leaning outlets emphasize the social justice aspect of the pension reforms, highlighting the increased support for mothers, disabled persons, and retirees. They focus on the positive impact of abolishing penalties for early retirement and the introduction of the 13th pension as a form of social welfare. The exemption from notary fees for low-income citizens is also seen as a measure to reduce inequality.

Center: Center-leaning sources report the facts of the legislative proposals neutrally, focusing on the technical details of the pension adjustment formula and the legal framework for notary fees. They present the reforms as necessary updates to social security and legal systems, aiming to balance fiscal responsibility with social benefits.

Right: Right-leaning perspectives may emphasize the economic sustainability of the pension system reforms, supporting the gradual adjustment formula and the encouragement of retirees to remain active in the workforce. They might highlight the importance of legal clarity in notary fees and the alignment with EU standards, while being cautious about the fiscal impact of increased pension benefits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *