The Pentagon and CIA keep defending the US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, claiming they seriously damaged Iran’s nuclear program. But hold on, is that really true? Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth calls the strikes a “historic success,” and President Donald Trump says he destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities. However, US media and intelligence reports cast doubt on these claims. A preliminary US intelligence report says the attacks only delayed Iran’s nuclear program by a few months, not completely destroyed it.
Hegseth accused the media of hunting for scandals and missing “historic moments” at a press conference. CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed that Iran’s nuclear capabilities were “seriously damaged,” but provided no new proof of the effectiveness of the June 22 strikes on three key Iranian nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
This situation sheds light on the US strategy and rhetoric in the conflict with Iran. Is this really a military success or just political propaganda? While the Pentagon defends its moves, the world remains divided and skeptical. What do you think? Are the US attacks on Iran truly a historic success or just another false victory? Drop a comment, maybe together we’ll expose this power play!
